Reality TV shows argument free essay sample

When you consider other types of television shows, like talk shows for example, the popularity of reality TV isn’t all that surprising. It seems that people simply enjoy watching other people perform various activities. Television networks realize this; therefore the number of reality shows has grown considerably in the last few years. Unfortunately, this type of programming has turned into something more than harmless entertainment. Reality television shows do not depict true reality because they are scripted, they overdramatize events, and they cannot capture the truth when people are in front of the camera. But do viewers care if their shows have been, say, artificially enhanced? Reality TV is a misnomer because much of the action and dialogue is actually scripted or controlled by the producers. Reality TV is a much manipulated format where the basis of it is that real people are put into unreal situations to create a story. We will write a custom essay sample on Reality TV shows argument or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page As soon as they get into an unreal situation, one could argue that it’s scripted, because the situation is created by the producers. The television music competition show, ‘The X Factor’, is supposed to be unscripted, but certain documents have revealed that the show follows an Australian production Bible which has the scripts of main aspects of this television series. A source involved with the show revealed that some on-screen events are manipulated in the post-production. Thus the show is scripted. This is well related to ‘American Idol’, where previously unknown individuals are meant to audition in front of unscripted judges, little do the viewer’s know, much of the conversation and judgment was previously planned. â€Å"Call it ‘partially scripted television’, says Ray Richmond. The longtime television critic who now blogs about entertainment and pop culture, said he has been trying – so far unsuccessfully—to have the term â€Å"reality television† switched to â€Å"partially scripted television. † Often, reality TV shows are meticulous in a sense of being highly overdramatic. Cameras document actual events of ordinary people or celebrities and overdramatize everyday situations. Producers of reality TV shows will hire actors and have them reenact and overdramatize events about themselves; therefore the events shown in the show were fraudulent and exaggerated. When exposed to an exaggeration or fabrication about certain real-life occurrences or facts, some people will perceive the fictional account as being truer than any factual account. This might lead to people acting on preconceptions about unfamiliar matters even in a life-or-death situation or cause viewers to cry foul when things on a show work out in a way that actually is realistic, but contrary to what everybody knows†, like complaining of the fake English accent of a real English actor or about a characters death from a bullet merely to the shoulder—suggesting that viewers often react in a dramatic way to situations that aren’t as tragic or breathtaking as they are perceived, simply because the producers intended to make that situation seem to be more emotional than it genuinely was. Reality shows invariably fail to capture the truth when people are in front of the camera. The show ‘Jersey Shore’ is an adequate representation of how editors and producers depict false situations of people in front of the camera. The show is simply young individuals being put on television, and being told what to do, how to do it, and what to say—they’re not being themselves. Ray Richmond informs viewers that, â€Å"The editors have grown to become the new storytellers, altering sequences and the course of events and contextual elements to weave together a story that’s radically different from what actually happened. † Ultimately when directors participate in doing this, it not only makes for a product that’s mislabeled, but also disingenuous and deceptive. Reality TV often succeeds in capturing and holding on to Americans attention because it allows them to fantasize about gaining status through automatic fame. Ordinary people can watch the shows, see people like themselves and imagine that they too could become celebrities by being on television. It does not matter as much that the contestants often are shown in an unfavorable light; the fact that millions of Americans are paying attention means that the contestants are important. And, in fact, some of the contestants have capitalized on their short-term celebrity: Colleen Haskell, from the first Survivor series, has a major role in the movie The Animal, and Richard Hatch, the scheming contestant who won the game, has been hired to host his own game show. If these former nobodies can become stars, then who couldnt? The message of reality television is that ordinary people can become so important that millions will watch them. And the secret thrill of many of those viewers is the thought that perhaps next time; the new celebrities might be them. An example would be ‘Duck Dynasty’; a show where normal people have their own television show for living their everyday life. Watching the show, you would say that they don’t have to act a certain way or say certain things because they are simply performing their daily routine around familiar people, which are there off the TV screen. But do you really know these people? How do you know they don’t act differently off the camera, in their everyday life? You don’t. Therefore, no one can truly say that these shows are one hundred percent accurate. By now we’re all well aware that most reality TV is anything but a reflection of reality, simply because it is often times scripted, it is highly overdramatized, and it cannot depict true images to the viewers. Reality TV shows may seem like a true depiction of reality and a harmless entertainment, but it does have deficiencies that people may not notice while they’re watching. It’s safe to say that artificiality is the new reality.

Social Welfare Influences

Social Welfare Influences In any modern organisation, the existence of social welfare is paramount. Social welfare is in man’s nature. Social welfare is about how people and societal institutions seek to provide set basic standards as well as certain minimum opportunities for its people. It is about the quality of life that affects access to essential social services. Advertising We will write a custom assessment sample on Social Welfare Influences specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The survival of man as an individual is dependent on the associations he forms with others. Man cannot survive on his own and therefore forms associations with others to ensure continuity of his species. In the primitive society, traditions and customs played a major role to ensure that family ties are maintained in order to ensure cooperation for the collective needs of the society. In today’s modern society such ties are slowly fading away and the society has put in institutions of governance to achieve the same. Society through institutions in government has laid down the necessary machinery including institutions of public finance to achieve that. Under such initiatives social services such as provision of medical services, security, Public health, provision of education, child welfare, provision of education and so on. It is therefore the role of the state government to ensure that the economic as well as the social well being of all its subjects. This is premised on the principle of equitable distribution of resources in society, equal opportunities for all as well as taking responsibility for those individuals who are unable to provide the basic minimum for themselves. With the fall of communism and the society has become increasingly capitalistic there has been a greater need to amerce wealth for each individual. Advertising Looking for assessment on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OF F Learn More Money has become pivotal in ensuring social welfare. This has lead to the constant pull and push between the haves and the have not’s, the employer and his employees , the bourgeoisie and the proletariat and so on in an effort of each individual guarantying their own personal wellbeing. In the past many considered social welfare as a private concern but in today’s modern world social welfare cuts across all divides of society and has found its place in public debates. Social welfare is largely affected by global trends such as globalization. Another issue that affects social welfare too is a states aging population as well as a state decline in fertility rates. The above concerns present a challenge to state economies that continue to sustain social welfare programmes. As a trend that affects the world over Globalisation is one that o state can ignore. Any economy that would still like to compete in the global market with other states that do not have to incur the burden of social spending tax. In order to continue sustaining their economies and supporting viable projects such states must completely eliminate all social commitments. In many industrial nations their population is aging therefore most of the social welfare programs are catered for the aged. Since the aged are the majority of the population the burden is then placed on the minority population. To sustain such a burden can be an enormous task for the minority population to sustain. Industrial nations have undergone sharp declines in population growth as well as fertility rates. Very few economies such as that of the United States have maintained their replacement rates. The result of such a trend is disastrous in terms of providing support for social welfare programs